Paraquat poisoning has caused one to two deaths per year,
WHAT IS PARAQUAT?
Parkinson’s disease is allegedly caused by long-term exposure to the common pesticide paraquat which is popularly used and sold in concentrated form and is mixed with water and sprayed on crops. When it comes to eliminating weeds and grasses that are glyphosate-resistant, it is quite effective. Farmers are at risk in this scenario because they come into contact with the herbicide up close. Additionally used on industrial farms, the poisonous pesticide expocal residents.
Parkinson’s lawsuit contends that manufacturers neglected to disclose the risk. Farmers, agricultural aborersurers, and others are being defended by attorneys in lawsuits for damages.
SHOULD YOU FILE A PARAQUAT CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT?
There are numerous justifications for bringing a case if you were exposed to paraquat and later got Parkinson’s disease.
A knowledgeable paraquat attorney can assist you in submitting a claim for a potential settlement, hold businesses accountable for misconduct, and raise awareness of the risks associated with paraquat.
COMPANIES NEED TO BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE
Plaintiffs in paraquat claims contend that the weed killer’s producers were aware for a long time that it was hazardous and might lead to Parkinson’s disease. They didn’t tell the plaintiffs or anyone else about this, so they kept selling it.
Over 377 companies worldwide make paraquat-containing goods. Syngenta’s Gramoxone brand is among the most well-known ones in the US. Herein, the lawsuit could make businesses answerable for their careless actions. Punitive damages are sometimes given by juries as punishment for businesses that willfully put the public in danger.
PARAQUAT SETTLEMENT: WHAT IS IT?
As the MDL is still in its early stages, no settlement has yet been reached, and there are multiple effects of paraquat, long-term, and short-term. The number of litigants participating may have an impact on the settlement’s available funds. Only monetary damages may be collected in the paraquat instances because they are being heard in civil court. The plaintiffs’ ability to accurately estimate past and future costs associated with their exposure to paraquat is therefore the more crucial.
